Coffee Talk #325: Homosexuality in Games

I was surprised to find that several Dragon Age II players are bothered by the homosexual romance options in the game — particularly the male romances. Some players are uncomfortable with…

Welcome to Coffee Talk! Let’s start off the day by discussing whatever is on your (nerd chic) mind. Every morning I’ll kick off a discussion and I’m counting on you to participate in it. If you’re not feelin’ my topic, feel free to start a chat with your fellow readers and see where it takes you. Whether you’re talking about videogames, the NCAA basketball final four, Wyclef Jean getting shot, or a Montanta Radio Shack offering free guns with Dish Network, Coffee Talk is the place to do it.

I was surprised to find that several Dragon Age II players are bothered by the homosexual romance options in the game — particularly the male romances. Some players are uncomfortable with their male Hawke being courted by Anders and Fenris. Some players wish that there was an option to turn off homosexual romances. I found these sentiments a bit backwards and homophobic, but I”m trying to understand why these gamers feel the way that they do.

I think it’s great that gamers have the option for their male Hawke to have a relationship with a whiny male apostate like Anders. I think it’s wonderful that players can have their female Hawke fall in love with a filthy pirate wench like Isabela. If players rather have a heterosexual relationship, those options are there too, of course. This is a role-playing game and I appreciate the diversity of romantic roles Dragon Age II offers. I don’t understand why some gamers have a problem with being hit on by a character of the same sex. If that’s not what you want then respond accordingly, no?

Do any of you have issues with the homosexual romances in Dragon Age II or other games? Does it make you uncomfortable? Or do you not care? I’m curious to hear your opinions. Let’s share and have a candid discussion. No judging please!

Ranking the American Idol 2011 Top 11

I was all set to write about American Idol’s “Top 10”, but Randy Jackson, Jennifer Lopez, and Steven Tyler used the judges’ save this week. Instead of 10 singers on the American Idol summer tour, there will be 11. It’s coming down to the wire and I wanted to rank the last 11 contestants. Let’s go!

1) Paul McDonald — This guy is completely awesome. His voice is so unique — as if he were the love child of Bob Dylan and Rod Stewart. He dances like a total spaz and it’s completely amusing. He’s more comfortable with his guitar, but I miss his chicken-like flailing when he uses it. More seriously, Paul has a great smile and is handsome. I’m sure he’ll do well with ladies of all ages. If America is still determined to vote for boring white guys with guitars (Kris Allen, Lee DeWyze) then he should automatically win. I seriously doubt he’ll take the prize — his voice is unique, but pretty weak and uncontrolled — but I’m going to keep voting for him until he’s booted off the show. Also, he gets bonus points for being a pro-wrestling mark.


2) James Durbin — Another pro-wrestling mark, Durbin has a powerful voice and can belt out screams like a poor man’s Adam Lambert. He’s confident and knows how to work the stage. Due to his asperger’s syndrome, he makes all sorts of funny faces when he’s not singing. If he loses, it’s because America is weirded out by his weird squinting and random eyebrow raising. Rockers have done well recently, with David Cook and Lee DeWyze winning the competition. If the trend continues, Durbin’s chances should be good.

3) Pia Toscano — I went to high school with this girl…or girls like her. She’s pretty much what I think of when I hear the word “guidette”. There are millions like her in New York. Pia has a really powerful voice and is very polished on stage. That said, she’s kind of boring. She’s belted out great ballads, but hasn’t done anything with mid-tempo or up-tempo songs. If she can take faster numbers and show great stage energy that complements her powerful voice, she has a great shot at winning.

4) Casey Abrams — The judges are super high on this guy…and I’m not sure why. Casey has a unique voice, but often overdoes it with growls and angry faces. He’s certainly the most musically interesting and daring contestant this year, but he lacks star power. At best, he looks like some hack barista or a stock boy at Home Depot. At worst, he looks someone you wouldn’t want your niece to be alone with. He’s probably going to get some sympathy votes for finishing last and being awarded the judges’ save. That “scene” was awesome btw — he was cursing on national television, had a seizure, and fell to his knees as he was hugging Ryan Seacrest. It looked like he was trying to get into Seacrest’s pants.

5) Jacob Lusk — This guy has the most powerful voice in the competition. He brings a lot of soul and gospel-infused vocals, but (until this week) he hasn’t shown much control. You can tell that he wants to belt out everything at 11, even when the song doesn’t call for it. I’m not sure if he’s gay, but he’s definitely effeminate. America has shown that it will vote for boring white guys (Kris Allen) over talented gay men (Adam Lambert). I expect him to yell his way out of the competition. If not, homophobes will get rid of him.

6) Scotty McCreery — I love this kid. He looks like Alfred E. Neuman and his crazy deep singing voice reminds me of Giant Bomb’s Brad Shoemaker (I’m convinced they’re related. I’ve told Brad this.). He’ll do well with voters that love country music — and Idol has lots of those — but he’ll probably be voted off during a week where the songs don’t fit his style. For example, this week he butchered a Stevie Wonder’s “For Once in My Life” by tunring it into country. I’m excited to see how he’ll country-fy Elton John next week.

7) Lauren Alaina — This young lady seems to be on the decline. She showed early promise with rocker vocals, but she’s been really flat over the last few weeks. She reminds me of a poor man’s Allison Iraheta. The judges, particularly Steven Tyler, seem high on her, but I don’t expect Lauren to make the top five.

8 ) Stefano Langone — This guy has the looks and the voice, but he seems caught up in his own little world. It’s hard to connect with the audience — and get votes — when it looks like you’re singing in the shower. His looks will keep him around for a little bit, but I don’t expect him to last long.


9) Thia Megia — An obvious product of Filipino stage parents, 16-year old Thia is adorable and has a great voice. She’s also extremely boring and can’t do anything other than ballads. In five years I expect her to be singing in theme parks and on cruise ships, making people wonder, “She has such a lovely voice. Why isn’t she doing better?” Like Stefano, she just can’t connect with the audience. I shouldn’t be so hard on her future though. She’s only 16 and has plenty of time to find herself. On a side note, I love when the judges question whether the contestants know who they are as artists. This girl is 16. She doesn’t know who she is as a person, let alone a recording artist.

10) Haley Reinhart — I have a huge crush on Haley. She dresses like a filthy pirate hooker — shows lots of leg and cleavage. She can sing in adorably sweet coos or sexy growls, but can’t quite bring it all together. She’s like a (really) poor man’s Christina Aguilera. She definitely lacks confidence and seems unsure of herself on stage. That will probably be her downfall. She has the potential to finish in the top five, but I don’t think she’ll make it.

11) Naima Adedapo — I love how American Idol showed videos of her working as a janitor at an arena. A quick Internet search shows that she’s also a dance instructor. Naima can definitely dance…but her singing has mostly been poor. The rumor mill says that she doesn’t get along with the other female contestants. She loses points for her voice, her BS background story, and hating on pro-wrestling. I hope she goes home next.

Anyway, those are my American Idol top 11 rankings. Let me know which contestants you like and which ones you hate. And vote for Paul!!!

Coffee Talk #324: What’s the Funniest Game of All Time?

Last night a friend totally stumped me when he asked, “What do you think the funniest game ever is?” Hours later, I’m still not sure of my answer. I immediately thought of several Tim Schafer games, as well as…

Welcome to Coffee Talk! Let’s start off the day by discussing whatever is on your (nerd chic) mind. Every morning I’ll kick off a discussion and I’m counting on you to participate in it. If you’re not feelin’ my topic, feel free to start a chat with your fellow readers and see where it takes you. Whether you’re talking about videogames, Hulk Hogan punching out Ryan Seacrest on American Idol, Scarlett Johansson dating Sean Penn, or getting people to call Facebook “The Facebook”, Coffee Talk is the place to do it.

Last night a friend totally stumped me when he asked, “What do you think the funniest game ever is?” Hours later, I’m still not sure of my answer. I immediately thought of several Tim Schafer games, as well as Conker’s Bad Fur Day. Erik Wolpaw’s work on Portal was some of the funniest writing ever in a videogame. Right now I’m leaning towards Portal…but I’m still not sure.

That’s where you come in! What are some of the funniest games you’ve played?

Insomniac Games Ted Price Speaks…and You Should Listen

Here’s my interview with Insomniac Games president & CEO Ted Price. My favorite part was when he explained why he wanted the original Ratchet & Clank referred to as a “character action game” instead of a platformer. Other topics include the company’s work on the Xbox 360, the socialization of gaming, and Insomniac’s 2011 lineup.

Confession: I really sucked in this interview. Thankfully Ted saved it with his great answers. As you can see, I wasn’t nearly as comfortable as I was during my Mike “Busta” Capps interview. I’ve known Ted for a long time and he’s a fantastic guy, but for some reason I kept thinking, “Gee, Ted Price sure is smart, successful, and handsome,” during the interview. As nice as he is, he can also be unnervingly awesome. Ha!

Coffee Talk #323: Will Gamers Always Be Scorally Fixated?

Are most gamers too lazy or indifferent to learn the reasoning behind the score? Will they always be fixated on the number instead of the reasoning behind it?

Welcome to Coffee Talk! Let’s start off the day by discussing whatever is on your (nerd chic) mind. Every morning I’ll kick off a discussion and I’m counting on you to participate in it. If you’re not feelin’ my topic, feel free to start a chat with your fellow readers and see where it takes you. Whether you’re talking about videogames, the Barry Bonds trial, Chris Brown vs. windows, or Christina Aguilera getting a Twitter account, Coffee Talk is the place to do it.

My video review of Dragon Age II finally posted. As expected, there were tons of negative comments from people that can’t see past their own perspective. Additionally, there were a lot of people that complained about the score being posted in the title of the review (not my decision, btw). For some reason, this was a big spoiler. Really?!?

Several of you know that I have all sorts of problems with the review process and score is a biggie. Considering how random and undefined most scoring systems are, it’s disappointing that so many gamers are fixated on an arbitrary number. If you’re interested in a game then don’t you owe it to yourself to find out why a game received the score that it did? Isn’t the reasoning behind the score more important than the score itself?

Am I expecting too much from the average gamer? (You guys and gals are all way above average, for the record.) Are most gamers too lazy or indifferent to learn the reasoning behind the score? Or do they just want to see a number and argue about it (without knowing whether a 5/10 or a 7/10 is average based on the outlet’s criteria)? Will gamers be able to get past scores? Or will they always be fixated on the number? Kindly share your thoughts in the comments section.

(And if you have extra time, please give my review a “thumbs up” on YouTube and leave a comment.)

Coffee Talk #322: Android Hardware in Amazon’s Future?

I wouldn’t be surprised to see Amazon phones and tablets featuring Google Android by the end of the year. The digital services are there, ready to be leveraged…

Welcome to Coffee Talk! Let’s start off the day by discussing whatever is on your (nerd chic) mind. Every morning I’ll kick off a discussion and I’m counting on you to participate in it. If you’re not feelin’ my topic, feel free to start a chat with your fellow readers and see where it takes you. Whether you’re talking about videogames, Sandrock323’s birthday, the chances of Verizon acquiring Sprint, or the countdown to MLB opening day, Coffee Talk is the place to do it.

I wouldn’t be surprised to see Amazon phones and tablets featuring Google Android by the end of the year. The company has done well selling digital music, movies, TV shows, and books. Its new Android Appstore is poised to do well. The Kindle e-reader is the company’s best-selling product of all time. It would make a lot of sense for Amazon to start selling hardware featuring seamless integration with its digital offerings. The pieces are there. Do you think Amazon is interested in expanding its hardware business to exploit its numerous digital products?

The mobile phone industry uses the razor-and-blade model. Carriers sell you the phone (the razor) for a relatively cheap price and keep you on the hook with monthly service (the blades). An Amazon Android phone or tablet would work similarly. Amazon or its carrier partners would sell you the hardware for a relatively low price. Amazon would stand to make more money selling you digital goods. In other words, it would use the Kindle model, but on a larger scale.

What do you think the chances are of Amazon branded Android hardware happening? Do you think it will be WiFi-only products, partnerships with mobile carriers, or both? Would you be interested in an Android phone with tight Amazon integration? I’d love to hear what you think!

Coffee Talk #321: Is Nintendo Being a Development Snob?

It was disappointing to see Nintendo of America president Reggie Fils-Aims speak out against so-called “garage developers”. Some of the most innovative products have come from…

Welcome to Coffee Talk! Let’s start off the day by discussing whatever is on your (nerd chic) mind. Every morning I’ll kick off a discussion and I’m counting on you to participate in it. If you’re not feelin’ my topic, feel free to start a chat with your fellow readers and see where it takes you. Whether you’re talking about videogames, hot phone announcements from CTIA 2011, the Lizard being in the next Spider-Man movie, or Carmelo Anthony poisoning the Knicks, Coffee Talk is the place to do it.

Some of the best software in the world was created by a bunch of kids in a dorm room or a handful of friends in a garage. Sometimes small, independent groups lead to world-changing innovations. Just look at companies like Apple, Facebook, etc. With that spirit in mind, it was disappointing to see Nintendo of America president Reggie Fils-Aime speak out against so-called “garage developers”. In a recent interview with Gamasutra he said:

I would separate out the true independent developer vs. the hobbyist. We are absolutely reaching out to the independent developer. Where we’ve drawn the line is we are not looking to do business today with the garage developer. In our view, that’s not a business we want to pursue.

On one hand, managing and reaching out to “garage developers” would cost a lot of money and consume a lot of time. There’s no guarantee of finding a pearl in a sea of indie developers. From a business perspective, I totally understand where Fils-Aime is coming from.

That said, I believe that he chose his words poorly (which is surprising for such a smooth talker). He made Nintendo appear snobbish, as if the company looks down on small developers. His comments fed into the belief that Nintendo is anti-innovation when it comes to third parties. For a company that has a poor track record with third-party developers, why alienate puppies that could grow up to be pit bulls that will bite you in the ass? I also bet there are some people in dorm rooms and garages that no longer dream of making Nintendo games because of what Fils-Aime said.

What do you think of Reggie’s comments? Is he just talking about smart business? Or is he sending a negative message to aspiring developers?

Coffee Talk #320: AT&T’s Acquisition of T-Mobile is Huge

AT&T’s acquisition of T-Mobile USA for $39-billion is an enormous move that will change the landscape of the American mobile market. There are several facets to this deal that make is so fascinating. Let’s take a look.

Welcome to Coffee Talk! Let’s start off the day by discussing whatever is on your (nerd chic) mind. Every morning I’ll kick off a discussion and I’m counting on you to participate in it. If you’re not feelin’ my topic, feel free to start a chat with your fellow readers and see where it takes you. Whether you’re talking about videogames, David Ortiz thinking he’s still relevant, hiring Austin Aries as your personal bodyguard, or Charlie Sheen’s comedy tour, Coffee Talk is the place to do it.

AT&T’s acquisition of T-Mobile USA for $39-billion is an enormous move that will change the landscape of the American mobile market. Longterm, it means less choice for consumers and less competition in an already tight market. That said, there are several facets to this deal that make is so fascinating. Let’s take a look.

I Love This Deal For AT&T
This is a brilliant move for AT&T on so many levels. Immediately it can claim to be America’s number-one network over Verizon by a large margin. Combining AT&T and T-Mobile USA subscribers adds up to roughly 130-million, while Verizon has around 100-million. Sprint would be left looking like a chump with 50-million subscribers.

In the near future — probably a year or so — both AT&T and T-Mobile customers can expect improved service. AT&T has been getting knocked for not spending its money on building towers to improve reception. It’s not nearly as easy as paying for a tower and building it. Local governments have to approve the placement of new towers (which takes longer than it ought to) and a lot of people don’t want them in their neighborhood. Buying T-Mobile USA was the quickest and easiest way to acquire several new towers.

Longer term, the acquisition jump-starts AT&T’s 4G initiatives. AT&T has committed to LTE, while T-Mobile USA planned to squeeze HSPA+ as long as it could before moving to LTE. AT&T’s 4G strategy prior to the acquisition seemed sluggish, especially compared to Verizon’s aggressive LTE deployment and Sprint’s dalliance with WiMax (all signs point to Sprint converting to LTE as well). In addition to buying a bunch of towers, AT&T also acquired a bunch of T-Mobile spectrum that will help the company accelerate its 4G plans. The initial idea is to use T-Mobile’s AWS spectrum as AT&T’s LTE channel.

I Love This Deal for T-Mobile…Should it Fall Through
A deal this size faces enormous scrutiny from the Justice Department and the FCC. Yesterday, I spoke with eight friends in the tech industry — analysts and journalists — and they were split on whether the deal happens or not. (Yes, I spent a large chunk of my Sunday talking nerd news with friends.) The good news for T-Mobile USA is that it will walk away with $3-billion and a chunk of AT&T spectrum, should the deal fall through. That’s a healthy “breakup clause” that would leave T-Mobile in a better position to compete.

I Hate This Deal as a T-Mobile Customer
Although nothing (much) will change for a few years, I completely expect T-Mobile’s value and customer service to decline as time goes on. T-Mobile’s plans are generous compared to AT&T’s and I expect the gap to close. Even if T-Mo is kept around as a value brand, I see things like unlimited data, free phone unlocking (for use with international SIM cards), free tethering, and top-notch customer-service being phased out.

The features I’ll miss the most are UMA and WiFi calling. In order to compensate for its small network footprint, T-Mobile allows its users to buy phones that use WiFi signal for calls and text messaging. This is also convenient for indoor locations that get poor signal (big buildings, basements, etc.) and customers that live in the boonies. As an international traveler, I love being able to use UMA and WiFi calling; it’s a “free” way to make and receive calls while in other countries (though I understand that was never the primary purpose of these features). The combined footprint of AT&T and T-Mobile makes supporting UMA and WiFi calling unnecessary. I fully expect these features to go away. When that happens, I’ll hug my phone and say, “I’ll miss you the most, Scarecrow.”

What to Do?!?
A lot of T-Mobile customers are panicking, erroneously thinking that their service will suck and their bills will double starting today. Get a grip people. It’ll be at least a year (and likely more) before any significant changes. As a T-Mobile customer, I’m ready to sign another two-year agreement with the company or perhaps buy my next phone outright and move to an Even More Plus plan. AT&T has already claimed that it will honor existing contracts. If it alters them in any way, that gives me an easy out to switch to Verizon.

AT&T customers have a bright future to look forward to. Existing services will improve some time next year and 4G services will arrive faster than originally scheduled. Of course that’s all dependent on government approval.

As always, I want to hear your thoughts on AT&T’s acquisition of T-Mobile USA from Deutsche Telecom. Fire away (please)!

HTC Thunderbolt Preview Video

Here’s a preview video of the HTC Thunderbolt — the first phone on Verizon’s blazing LTE network. The Thunderbolt features Google Android 2.2 with HTC Sense, a 4.3-inch screen, a 1GHz Snapdragon processor, an eight-megapixel rear-facing camera, a 1.3-megapixel front-facing camera, and…a kickstand! It’s a lot like the HTC Evo 4G for Sprint, but with updated parts (the processor and screen are better).

My initial Speedtest.net results were crazy good. I was getting download speeds over 11Mbps and upload speeds over 37Mbps. From what I understand, Speedtest.net is probably doing something funky with the upload test, so I’m not really buying those results. Still, the speeds are fantastic in terms of real-world usage — better than what I’ve been getting on Sprint’s WiMax network and T-Mobile’s HSPA+ network.

Check out the video when you have a moment and let me know if you have any questions about this hot new phone for Verizon. Expect a full review next week.

Mark Cerny Talks Mobile, Social, Motion, and More

Here’s an interview I did with the legendary Mark Cerny. For those of you not familiar with the man, he has been designing games since he was a teenager, working on titles like Marble Madness, Sonic the Hedgehog 2, Spyro the Dragon, Crash Bandicoot, Jak& Daxter, Ratchet & Clank, and so much more. Since he has pretty much seen and done it all, I wanted to get his take on newer trends in gaming, such mobile, social, and motion. As expected, his answers were interesting and insightful…which was great because I totally went fanboy in the interview. I think I called him awesome like 50 times. Ha!

Anyway, check out this interview with Mark Cerny. He is awesome.